PAST
SCHOOL COVERAGE 
Chances
for a school in RM are getting slim, RMA official says
(May 25, 2003)
>more

Developer
submits plans to build 64 homes on Escuela school site
(December 4, 2002)
>more

District
says Murieta school will have to wait until 2004 bond issue
(September 8, 2002)
>more

Elk
Grove district outlines current thoughts on a school in Rancho
Murieta
(July 25, 2002)
>more

Overflow
crowd at RMA cheers opponents and supporters of new school
(July 18, 2002)
>more

District
is rethinking plans to build a school in Rancho Murieta
(June 29, 2002)
>more

Board
approves agreement to let school traffic use North Gate
(May 23, 2002)
>more

RMA
releases proposal to give school traffic access to the community
(April 25, 2002)
>more

New
school poses question on public access -- Stonehouse Road
or through the North Gate?
(February 17, 2002)
>more

District
has new interest in building school, committee says, but funding
is uncertain
(August 17, 2001)
>more

Elk
Grove school officials say new school isn't in the works
(February 1, 2001)
>more |
|
Officials
of River West Investments, Bret Hogge, standing, and
company president Brian Vail, attended the session of
the Cosumnes Comunity Planning Advisory Council. |
Developer,
RMA unite in call for Elk Grove schools to buy Escuela site
Published
Tuesday, October 28,, 2003
When
a plan for building 64 homes on the school site at Stonehouse
Road and Escuela Drive came before a planning group last
week, you might have expected sparks to fly between the
developer and a contingent from the Rancho Murieta Association.
But
as it turns out, the two found they had something in common
-- both want to see the Elk Grove Unified School District
acquire the property for an elementary school.
For
Brian Vail, president of River West Investments, it means
getting out from under the $20,000 a year he says the 13.8-acre
site costs his firm in taxes and assessments.
"Our
position hasn't changed. We're more than willing
to entertain any reasonable offer," Bret Hogge, land-use
manager for River West, told the Cosumnes Community Planning
Advisory Council Wednesday. "If the school district
is interested, we made it clear to (Constantine I. Baranoff,
assistant superintendent, facilities and planning) that
we will withdraw this tentative map at any time before the
approval if they decide this is a priority and make an offer
on this parcel."
"We are doing our best to encourage the school district
to buy the site," said RMA President Paul Gumbinger.
He outlined the "alternate proposal" to improve
Stonehouse Road for safe access to the school "at
no expense at all to the county, at no expense at all to
the Rancho Murieta Association." He said under the
proposal the school district would pay its fair share of
costs for a
section of Stonehouse next to the school property.
The plan called for Operating Engineers' trainees
to provide free labor and equipment and the North developer
to pay for engineering and materials. A memorandum of agreement
was being developed in March for the project to go forward
this past summer, but the school district didn't commit
to the site. Instead, it announced it was considering other
sites and hoped to make a decision by the end of this year.
Gumbinger
noted the Escuela site has water and sewer infrastructure
that's unavailable elsewhere in the area, including
at the present elementary school, Cosumnes River, which
uses a septic system and well water. "So I think there's
a lot of positives here."
He
described Cosumnes as an overcrowded school in a location
that's "an accident waiting to happen."
The overwhelming majority of children who attend the school
live in Rancho Murieta.
Gumbinger
said the school district "backed off" from buying
the school site because of public opposition to having the
access through the community. With the alternative solution
of using an improved and safe Stonehouse Road, he believes
"that's been resolved." Even so, he said
a school for Rancho Murieta would be "number 34 in
the (school district's) line-up of elementary schools."
RMA General Manager Greg Vorster noted that the RMA has
given the school district a signed agreement for access
through the North Gate.
Gumbinger said the town hall meeting on the school issue
scheduled for Nov. 4 at the Country Club will be "a
fact-finding forum" and an opportunity for "putting
pressure on the school district." The Kiwanis Club,
sponsor of the event, will prepare a formal report about
what transpires.
When
a CCPAC member suggested that River West's proposal could
be used to get the school district moving on the school
site purchase, Vail admitted, "Well, that's kind of what
this whole project's all about," and the dozen or so people
present laughed.
"To
be perfectly honest with you, we've always wanted this to
be a school site," he continued. "And we've held it for
four years. … Nobody's done a damn thing. So I finally
have to go and spend all this money and submit this application.
… I've tried for four years. I've said, ‘I'll
lease it to you for a dollar a year, I'll do anything you
want.'"
CCPAC,
a volunteer advisory group to the planning department, took
no action on River West's tentative map. At the suggestion
of Rob Burness, senior planner for the county planning department,
the matter was continued until after the school forum is
held.
The
two Rancho Murieta residents on the council, John Kershaw
and Kevin Slagle, said they plan to attend the forum. Vail
declined Gumbinger's invitation.
| Do
you have comments about this topic or story? Share them
at RanchoMurieta.com's Community
Views page. |
|