::: COMMUNITY NEWS

Previous coverage of North Gate

RMA makes no decision on North Gate proposals (July 17, 2003)

RMA board is set to act on North Gate proposal (July 14, 2003)

North Gate session opens final discussion period (June 2, 2003)

With final decison near, North Gate relocation draws criticism at RMA session (February 22, 2003)

North Gate choices narrowed to one that eliminates left onto Lago (January 23, 2003)

New North Gate proposal would close Lago and create playground-park area (December 2, 2002)

CSD public outreach yields questions and answers on North Gate (November 3, 2002)

What are your thoughts on North Gate relocation? CSD wants to know (September 15, 2002)

 

Builders close escrow on Murieta Hills development land, triggering $1.4 million for new North Gate

Pop-up window: Click for a four-year archive of development coverage -- news, maps, photos and more

Published Tuesday, December 28, 2004

Though the Rancho Murieta Association board apparently didn't know it at the time of its December meeting, the need for an ad hoc committee to determine the design for the new North Gate was becoming a higher priority.

That's because earlier this month Murieta Holdings developers completed the sale of the Residences of Murieta Hills property to builders Warmington Homes and Woodside Homes of California.

On Monday, Murieta Holdings principals Robert J. Cassano and Gerry N. Kamilos confirmed that the escrows closed mid-month, triggering a provision in the Mutual Benefit Agreement for the developers to pay the community $1.4 million for the redesign and rebuild of the gate.

The MBA calls for the RMA to submit plans for the location of the gate to the developers upon the close of escrow for the Retreat and the Residences properties.

The three Retreat properties were acquired by Cassano and Kamilos in early October.

Murieta Hills is planned as 238 homes at the northwest edge of the community, on land bounded by Stonehouse Road and Guadalupe, Puerto and Escuela drives.

Those projects are in the county planning process and will proceed as the county tries to bring about peace-making conversations between developers and development opponents in the new year.

After the developers receive the RMA's gate plans, they have 60 days to deliver conceptual plans and specifications for the gate facilities to the RMA for its review and approval.

As outlined in the MBA, the plan is to complete the planning process and begin the construction process within 180 days.

The gate rebuild project is important to the developers for marketing and aesthetic reasons and important to the RMA and CSD for better functionality and improved traffic flow.

The need for a better functioning gate has been recognized for years by both the RMA and CSD. General Manager Greg Vorster said at the RMA meeting that members voted in favor of a 1999 RMA plan for a $425,000 gate rebuild, but not enough voted to pass the measure. Sixty percent of the community needed to vote yes to proceed.

Although the present automatic-entry gate system wasn't scheduled to be installed until the gate was rebuilt, the CSD considered problems at the North Gate serious enough to move ahead with the installation in 2002. The district agreed to pay the additional cost of moving the system if, as assumed, the gate were relocated farther up the Parkway.

The CSD and the RMA worked together to implement and pay for the access system, which has succeeded in getting more residents to use the residents' lane and eased congestion at the gate. Retired Security Chief Jim Noller referred to the access system as "the Band-Aid that saved us."

The CSD even proposed at one time to front the money to rebuild the gate but was unable to reach agreement with the developers on terms for repayment.

A previous ad hoc gate committee comprised of RMA and CSD representatives developed four alternatives for the gate design. The options were presented at numerous CSD and RMA board meetings, a town hall, and at the RMA annual membership meeting. Last year, the CSD board voted in support of the option the committee recommended. After the RMA board declined to vote on the options, the committee was disbanded.

At Tuesday's meeting, the RMA board voted to exclude the CSD from participation on the new ad hoc committee for the gate design. The board is expected to choose five committee members -- one of them an RMA director -- in January.

CSD General Manager Ed Crouse said the day after the meeting that the RMA has the authority through the MBA to deal with the developer on the gate design and noted that the district "has gone on the record as far as the desired location of the North Gate." He added that he hoped the new ad hoc committee would meet informally with the CSD for its input on the interior design and layout "given that our officers have manned the gates for 20-odd years."

"If they should ask us to help them with the site location, we'd be more than willing to weigh in with our recommendation. … We're not interested in reinventing the process… It didn't seem an appropriate use of time to redo what we've already spent countless hours in meetings (doing) … to make a recommendation to the RMA board," Crouse said.

In the MBA, the RMA agrees to consult with the CSD on the plans for the new gate.
The gate rebuild is one of several provisions of the MBA that have taken effect in recent months.

The parks were deeded to the RMA earlier this year and a new, nonprofit mutual benefit corporation called the Rancho Murieta North Association has been formed for the planned North development.



Do you have comments about this topic or story? Share them at RanchoMurieta.com's Community Views page.