::: COMMUNITY NEWS

Murietan John Sullivan presented plans to develop outside the community's boundaries.

Other news from this meeting

Skatepark opponents ask for board response

Update on RMA cable plan

RMA asked to broadcast county meetings

Governing Documents committee needs members


 

RMA hears plan to build hundreds of homes adjacent to Murieta

Published Thursday, January 18, 2007

A plan to develop property located outside Rancho Murieta’s boundaries and the county's urban services boundary took center stage at the Rancho Murieta Association board meeting Tuesday.

Using large poster boards and computer slides, resident John Sullivan placed the development goals of the local property owners he represents in the context of county planning for an update of the general plan through 2030.

According to Sullivan, the general plan update provides an opportunity for the development called Murieta West Planning Area to be included in the urban services boundary, and all of the landowners have filed applications requesting inclusion.

Sullivan said planning staff is working to provide additional information on what the county calls “the Jackson Road visioning,” which includes “35,000 homes that are going to be between Sunrise Boulevard and downtown Sacramento in what is called Jackson Road South and Jackson Road West …”

“That creates enormous impacts on the people of Rancho Murieta,” Sullivan said. He urged the RMA board to form a political action committee to secure road improvements for Scott Road between Rancho Murieta and Folsom and Highway 16 from Rancho Murieta to the areas slated for road improvements.

Sullivan said the Murieta West landowners -- he has previously identified them as Rancho Airport Inc., the Murieta Equestrian Center, PDA Trust, Carol Anderson Ward Trust, the Frank family trust, the Gonsalves family trust and the Hoberg family trust -- want "to build out Rancho Murieta to its full potential. … We want Sacramento County planning to interface these important transportation, open space, infrastructure issues into the current general plan and we would like Murieta West Planning Area to be part of the 2030 general plan (environmental impact review) process."

Sullivan described the Murieta West development plan as “density-neutral” with the county general plan and the community’s master plan, which set build-out for the community at 5,200 residential units.

Although the Mutual Benefit Agreement between the RMA and the Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers reduced densities planned for Murieta North and capped the development number at about 4,200, the county build-out figure remains at 5,200.

Based on the MBA figure and other proposed development, the current estimate for build-out is 4,345. This does not include the Murieta West development, which Sullivan estimated at 550 units at the RMA meeting and the Community Services District estimates at 600 for planning purposes. The CSD has responded to the prevailing uncertainty about the final build-out figure by planning for three tiers, with 5,200 recognized as the high build-out tier.

The services boundary -- the county's effort to contain development -- presently comes no closer than just east of Grant Line Road. Rancho Murieta development began in the early 1970s, two decades before the boundary was drawn, and Murieta is designated as an island of development outside the boundary.

In addition to requiring a change in the urban services boundary, the Murieta West proposal needs the Community Services District to expand its sphere of influence in order to provide water and sewer services for the development. This would require approval from the Local Agency Formation Commission.

Sullivan points out that most of the property – the Equestrian Center, the airport and the 200-acre agricultural reserve – is within the district and already receives CSD services, although this area was not planned for the residential and commercial development that’s being proposed.

Sullivan pointed out changes and refinements in the Murieta West plan that include moving a hotel from the 220-acre Frank property on Stonehouse Road, where a church and the new elementary school are planned. The new location for the hotel is across from the equine center on Lone Pine Drive, which would become a new commercial center. A multi-level structure is planned for Lookout Hill, the towering knoll across from the North Gate.

The connectivity Sullivan proposes between the community and Sacramento Valley Conservancy property adjoining Rancho Murieta on the north utilizes the existing county park area by the airport, loops around development proposed next to the airport and skirts the present gated community to link up with the 4,000-plus-acre Deer Creek Hills conservancy property.

Sullivan has met with RMA, Country Club and CSD officials to generate support for the project. He talked about annexation at the RMA and presented a proposal for a $20 million reservoir for drought needs to the CSD last week.

On Tuesday night, Sullivan also talked about solving the wastewater issues in the cease and desist order, saying Murieta West proposals to use recycled wastewater in “purple pipe” applications would address the excess.

The CSD’s current wastewater storage problems are attributed to carryover storage from 2003 and the Country Club’s cutback in water use for the golf courses over the last few years. The club uses treated recycled wastewater to irrigate the two courses.

Long-term wastewater storage and disposal needs and costs are now being evaluated by a consultant to the CSD. The report is due in July.

At the conclusion of Sullivan’s half-hour presentation, Rancho Murieta Development Concerned Citizens Committee member Candy Chand disputed his interpretation of the general plan update process.

“There is no one who has given any indication that they’re giving even close to a green light towards changing the urban service boundary in Rancho Murieta. ... It flies in the face of all planning logic,” she said, noting that housing presses out from the city into the countryside, not the other way around.

Previous coverage

Skatepark opponents ask for board response

Evelyn Caudill told board members she was disappointed they hadn’t acknowledged the packet of information about the proposed skateboard park she hand-delivered to them weeks ago.

She said the material included a request for a survey of the membership on the topic of the skateboard park proposed for Stonehouse Park, a petition against the park signed by 138 homeowners, and information about parks in the area.

“I have served on two boards and several committees and if there’s one thing that I have learned it’s that communication with the members of an association is very important,” she said.

Mary Lou Craig also asked the board for a survey and provided them with a Sacramento Bee story about problems at an area skateboard park.

The skateboard park appears on the community’s parks master plan as an unfunded project. A site at Stonehouse Park was identified for the project more than five years ago.

Last year, the Kiwanis Club donated $9,400 and the Parks Committee provided $600 from the parks fund to pay for a $10,000 skateboard park design.

There were three meetings devoted to the project, two of which were conducted by the designer. The third meeting, held in late September, consisted of opponents and supporters of the project offering their opinions to the Parks Committee. Questions about liability and insurance costs raised at that meeting were supposed to be researched and addressed at a future Parks Committee meeting.

Update on RMA cable plan

John Weatherford said the RMA’s cable TV plan is “off to a rocky start” because it wasn’t in place by Dec. 31 and has lost 13 subscribers. General Manager David Stiffler responded that the business plan projected a loss of 15 to 20 percent of the premium channel customers in the changeover to digital programming and the loss to date is 4 percent.

The digital start-up is stalled due to delivery delays for several pieces of equipment. Director Mel Standart, chair of the Communications Committee, said the digital operation is expected to be in place 45 days after the equipment is received.

RMA asked to broadcast county meetings

The RMA board hopes to broadcast the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors Jan. 10 meeting on Channel 5. RMDCCC member Candy Chand requested the broadcast and was told the association was planning to air the tape of the 3½-hour session on the Retreat and Residences of Murieta Hills developments proposed for Murieta North. The hearing has been continued to April.

Former RMA director Julie Sams requested that another item from the Jan. 10 meeting be included in the broadcast -- the supervisors' approval of an amended wastewater plant permit for the CSD. The archived recordings of the supervisors meetings are available here.

Governing Documents Committee needs members

General Manager David Stiffler said the Governing Documents Committee is in need of members. The committee is charged with the task of overhauling the CC&Rs. Anyone interested in being on the committee can contact the RMA at 354-3500.



Do you have comments about this topic or story? Share them at RanchoMurieta.com's Community Views page.