::: COMMUNITY NEWS

Town hall

Lawyer Curtis Sproul, left, explained his goals for a new homeowners association after being introduced by developer Robert J. Cassano, right. (Click photo for larger image.)

Developers postpone forum to help launch of RMA's broadband business

Pop-up window: Click here for archive of development coverage -- news, maps, photos and more

Updated Friday, March 8, 2002

The Murieta Holdings developers agreed to postpone a community forum planned for later this month after a resident complained at Thursday's "town hall" meeting that a survey being distributed in connection with the forum was "very misleading ... outright fraud" and damaging to the community's planned cable Internet business.

Instead of a meeting March 26, the developers said Friday that the meeting will be held in June.

At Thursday night's meeting, resident John Weatherford objected to the technology survey -- created by a consultant hired by the developers in cooperation with the RMA -- because it was mailed in a Rancho Murieta Association envelope and carried an RMA logo on the form.

"I thought it was very misleading. I thought it was outright fraud," Weatherford said. "I don't like things sent to me that are fake. … There's nothing on this that identifies you or (the consultant). … If it's from the RMA, that means one thing. If it's from you, that means something else, in my opinion."

The survey, which you can fill out here, asks the community's opinions about various technologies, from Internet connections to smart appliances to high-tech golfing.

Developer Gerry N. Kamilos, who ran the meeting with partner Robert J. Cassano, apologized for any confusion and said there was no intent to deceive anyone.

Weatherford

"I thought it was outright fraud," said John Weatherford.

"The buck stops here, and we will take the responsibility for that," Kamilos said. "But the intent was to get some information that will be useful for this community."

Weatherford said it was "stretching it a bit" to claim the RMA played a role in the survey. He said two RMA board members he spoke with were unaware of any connection at all.

"We made every effort to assure there was input with the RMA staff as well as with the community," Kamilos said.

"My understanding, and I'll certainly look into it, was that prior to the survey going out there should've been some coordination with the RMA. My understanding too is that the RMA agreed to use their bulk mail system … to allow us to utilize that. And certainly all that couldn't have happened unless there was some level of cooperation."

Kamilos said the developers are picking up the $40,000 tab for the research project.

Weatherford said the survey's apparent RMA connection creates confusion around the community's cable Internet initiative, which is scheduled to launch May 1. That project already faces announced competition from Pac Bell DSL, and Weatherford said the survey, if from the RMA, seems to suggest a lack of resolve about the cable Internet plan.

Said Kamilos, "Maybe the timing of the survey … given the debate going on in the community ... was maybe not the very best."

"The board and Communications Committee have stumbled badly in getting information to us," and caused confusion, Weatherford said. "This causes more."

When Weatherford asked that the March 26 community forum be canceled or delayed, Kamilos said he would check with RMA General Manager Greg Vorster and RMA board members on their thoughts about a delay.

"If in their judgment it should be postponed, we'll postpone it," Kamilos said.

When Weatherford sat down, resident Robert Johnson took the microphone to ask that the March 26 meeting go on as scheduled -- "to have an open forum for discussing of technologies and communication."

Johnson, who has written a half-dozen e-mails to RanchoMurieta.com in the last month opposing the RMA's broadband plan, said his feelings are not a secret. "I'm in favor that users of the technology pay for the technology," he said, "rather than everyone pay for the technology."

Weatherford returned to the microphone to point out that Johnson, who owns and operates the Rancho Murieta Business Center, is signing up customers for Pac Bell DSL service through his business, though Johnson says he is not profiting by the arrangement.

 

New homeowners association seen as similar to RMA

Residents of the build-out developments of Rancho Murieta North will have a new homeowners association that's a small governing body, strictly enforcing CC&Rs similar to those already in place in the community.

That was the view of the future outlined by lawyer Curtis Sproul at Thursday night's monthly "town hall" meeting. About 20 people attended the hour-long session, which is being broadcast on Channel 5 through March 17. (See the RanchoMurieta.com daily calendar for broadcast times.)

Sproul, who wrote the revised CC&Rs approved by the community in 1996, was introduced by Robert J. Cassano, half of the Murieta Holdings development team.

The new organization will be called the Rancho Murieta North Association, Cassano said. He added that Sproul's CC&Rs for the new organization will be written to "live and breathe side by side with minimum conflict" with the present North CC&Rs.

Said Sproul, "When I do the Murieta North documents … my thought is make all the documents for the overall area known as Rancho Murieta as close together as possible, so down the road … someday there will be just one master association over the whole community."

Sproul responded to criticism of the Murieta Holdings developers for their desire to have a separate association.

"I want to emphasize that the fact they want to remain separate, I don't perceive that as nefarious or even out of the ordinary," he said. "In fact, it's very ordinary that developers would want to control their product and what they do."

He added, "One of the things we've got is a very easy mechanism to one day merge the two organizations, if that's desirable."

Asked about enforcement of the CC&Rs, Sproul pointed to Cassano's many years with Robert C. Powell, developing Campus Commons and Gold River -- two communities with tightly enforced rules.

"The whole Powell ethos … was to really be very firm and to make the CC&Rs say something," said Sproul. He added, "I imagine in the North as long as these folks are running the show, it will be very strict."

Unlike Campus Commons and Gold River, which have a lot of associations or board members or both, Sproul said the Rancho Murieta North Association would aim for a single governing body of manageable size, with a sub-association only if needed.

Development agreement given to RMA

The Murieta Holdings developers have delivered to the Rancho Murieta Association what the developers hope is the final version of the development agreement.

The developers say now they'll next begin a dialogue with the Community Services District on providing service to their developments.

Developer Gerry N. Kamilos said the county is in final stages of preparing the environmental impact reports for the developers' Murieta Hills and Retreats projects.

"It appears we're on track to begin the public hearing process sometime in late April or early May," Kamilos said. The projects probably will go before the board of supervisors this summer, he said.

 

Do you have comments about this topic or story? Share them at RanchoMurieta.com's Community Views page.