I am confused. I attended the meeting in 2017 when RMA presented the idea that village residents needed to pay their fair share of using the "amenities" of the north and south. Apparently the 91 users from the village caused a noticible wear and tear on roads and parks such that reimbursement was required to be fair to all users. An initial amount of about $760 a year was eventually proposed. After much outcry, this was reduced to $300 a year. Then we find out it wasn't about wear and tear on "amenities" but rather access to water rights!!! WTH!
All the articles, letters and alleged explanations are confusing. Is it wear and tear or is it about water? Why the deception? And why the division of a so called community? Why the need for lengthy legal documents and threats of liens?
I have not met one person from either north or south that thinks that taking away our bar code access is a fair resolution to whatever the real problem may be.
So what is the real problem? And why are our leaders not able to honestly and openly deal with it?
What does the rest of RM think?